Search for: All records

The detailed study of the effect of the initial microstructure on its evolution under hydrostatic compression before, during, and after the irreversible α→ω phase transformation and during pressure release in Zr using in situ x-ray diffraction is presented. Two samples were studied: one is plastically pre-deformed Zr with saturated hardness and the other is annealed. Phase transformation α→ω initiates at lower pressure for a pre-deformed sample but for a volume fraction of ω Zr, c>0.7, a larger volume fraction is observed for the annealed sample. This implies that the proportionality between the athermal resistance to the transformation and the yield strength in the continuum phase transformation theory is invalid; an advanced version of the theory is outlined. Phenomenological plasticity theory under hydrostatic loading is outlined in terms of microstructural parameters, and plastic strain is estimated. During transformation, the first rule is suggested, i.e., the average domain size, microstrain, and dislocation density in ω Zr for c<0.8 are functions of the volume fraction, c of ω Zr only, which are independent of the plastic strain tensor prior to transformation and pressure. The microstructure is not inherited during phase transformation. Surprisingly, for the annealed sample, the final dislocation density and the average microstrain after pressure release in the ω phase are larger than for the severely pre-deformed sample. The results suggest that an extended experimental basis is required for the predictive models for the combined pressure-induced phase transformations and microstructure evolutions. 

The effect of initial microstructure and its evolution across the α→ω phase transformation in commercially pure Zr under hydrostatic compression has been studied using in situ x-ray diffraction measurements. Two samples were studied: one is plastically pre-deformed Zr with saturated hardness and the other is annealed. Phase transformation α→ω initiates at lower pressure for pre-deformed sample, suggesting pre-straining promotes nucleation by producing more defects with stronger stress concentrators. With transformation progress, the promoting effect on nucleation reduces while that on growth is suppressed by producing more obstacles for interface propagation. The crystal domain size reduces and microstrain and dislocation density increase during loading for both α and ω phases in their single-phase regions. For α phase, domain sizes are much smaller for prestrained Zr, while microstrain and dislocation densities are much higher. On the other hand, they do not differ much in ω Zr for both prestrained and annealed samples, implying that microstructure is not inherited during phase transformation. The significant effect of pressure on the microstructural parameters (domain size, microstrain, and dislocation density) demonstrates that their postmortem evaluation does not represent the true conditions during loading. A simple model for the initiation of the phase transformation involving microstrain is suggested, and a possible model for the growth is outlined. The obtained results suggest an extended experimental basis is required for better predictive models for the pressure-induced and combined pressure- and strain-induced phase transformations. 

Abstract Amorphous diamond, formed by high-pressure compression of glassy carbon, is of interests for new carbon materials with unique properties such as high compressive strength. Previous studies attributed the ultrahigh strength of the compressed glassy carbon to structural transformation from graphite-likesp²-bonded structure to diamond-likesp³-bonded structure. However, there is no direct experimental determination of the bond structure of the compressed glassy carbon, because of experimental challenges. Here we succeeded to experimentally determine pair distribution functions of a glassy carbon at ultrahigh pressures up to 49.0 GPa by utilizing our recently developed double-stage large volume cell. Our results show that the C-C-C bond angle in the glassy carbon remains close to 120°, which is the ideal angle for thesp²-bonded honey-comb structure, up to 49.0 GPa. Our data clearly indicate that the glassy carbon maintains graphite-like structure up to 49.0 GPa. In contrast, graphene interlayer distance decreases sharply with increasing pressure, approaching values of the second neighbor C-C distance above 31.4 GPa. Linkages between the graphene layers may be formed with such a short distance, but not in the form of tetrahedralsp³bond. The unique structure of the compressed glassy carbon may be the key to the ultrahigh strength.